Fieldlens vs Procore
Fieldlens vs Procore, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Fieldlens is on 59/100 and Procore on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Fieldlens
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 38/100
Procore
- domain rating: 83/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 4,776 against 99
- LinkedIn following: 364,446 against 8,652
At a glance
| Measure | Fieldlens | Procore |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Real-time jobsite collaboration software connecting field and office teams in construction. | Cloud-based construction management software for general contractors and owners. |
| Category | Construction Tech, Vertical SaaS, Project Management, Collaboration Software | Construction Tech, Vertical SaaS, Building Information Modeling, Project Management Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2010 | 2002 |
| Headquarters | Tampa, United States | Carpinteria, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Fieldlens | Procore |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 99 | 4,776 |
| Total funding | $17.7M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series A | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 8,652 | 364,446 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Fieldlens | Procore |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 59/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 50/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 55/100 | 83/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Fieldlens | Procore |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Fieldlens | Procore |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 3 threads | Not published |
“WeWork has acquired 21 startups in the last four years, from a college messaging service to a real estate investing app. Here's everything WeWork has bought.. Spacious SpaceIQ Waltz Prolific Interactive Islands Media Managed by Q Euclid Ana”r/buzzfeedbot
Fieldlens vs Procore: common questions
Which is better, Fieldlens or Procore?
On our 0-100 score Fieldlens rates higher (59/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Fieldlens and Procore compare on the numbers?
Fieldlens leads on agent readiness (48/100 against 38/100). Procore leads on domain rating (83/100 against 55/100), headcount (4,776 against 99), LinkedIn following (364,446 against 8,652).
What do real users say about Fieldlens and Procore?
Fieldlens: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/buzzfeedbot.
Read the full Fieldlens review and pricing or the Procore review and pricing. You can also browse other Fieldlens alternatives we track.