Field Effect vs SCADAfence
Field Effect vs SCADAfence, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Field Effect is on 49/100 and SCADAfence on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Field Effect
- headcount: 150 against 29
SCADAfence
- our overall score: 55/100 against 49/100
- domain rating: 88/100 against 66/100
- LinkedIn following: 9,190 against 6,696
At a glance
| Measure | Field Effect | SCADAfence |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cybersecurity platform for operational technology (OT) and industrial control systems. | Industrial cybersecurity and OT/IoT solutions for critical infrastructure and manufacturing. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Industrial IoT, OT Security, ICS Security | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Industrial IoT, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software | services |
| Founded | 2018 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Ottawa, Canada | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Field Effect | SCADAfence |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 150 | 29 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -20.6% |
| Total funding | Not published | $26.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Funding Round |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,696 | 9,190 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Field Effect | SCADAfence |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 49/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 52/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 66/100 | 88/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Field Effect | SCADAfence |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Azure |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot, Freshdesk | Not detected |
Field Effect vs SCADAfence: common questions
Which is better, Field Effect or SCADAfence?
On our 0-100 score SCADAfence rates higher (55/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Field Effect and SCADAfence compare on the numbers?
Field Effect leads on headcount (150 against 29). SCADAfence leads on our overall score (55/100 against 49/100), domain rating (88/100 against 66/100), LinkedIn following (9,190 against 6,696).
Read the full Field Effect review and pricing or the SCADAfence review and pricing. You can also browse other Field Effect alternatives we track.