Field Effect vs SAM Seamless Network
Field Effect vs SAM Seamless Network, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Field Effect is on 49/100 and SAM Seamless Network on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Field Effect
- headcount: 150 against 49
SAM Seamless Network
- our overall score: 62/100 against 49/100
- domain rating: 86/100 against 66/100
- LinkedIn following: 10,486 against 6,696
At a glance
| Measure | Field Effect | SAM Seamless Network |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cybersecurity platform for operational technology (OT) and industrial control systems. | Cloud-native security and intelligence for unmanaged networks and IoT devices, protecting against cyber threats. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Industrial IoT, OT Security, ICS Security | Cybersecurity, IoT Security, Network Security, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Ottawa, Canada | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Field Effect | SAM Seamless Network |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 150 | 49 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -14.7% |
| Total funding | Not published | $50.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,696 | 10,486 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Field Effect | SAM Seamless Network |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 49/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 66/100 | 86/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Field Effect | SAM Seamless Network |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Graphql |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot, Freshdesk | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Field Effect | SAM Seamless Network |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 3 positive, 0 negative across 3 threads |
“Intel Capital leads $12 million round for SAM Seamless Network and its home IoT security system https://t.co/8mGhQfWrIP.”r/newsbotFUNDING
Field Effect vs SAM Seamless Network: common questions
Which is better, Field Effect or SAM Seamless Network?
On our 0-100 score SAM Seamless Network rates higher (62/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Field Effect and SAM Seamless Network compare on the numbers?
Field Effect leads on headcount (150 against 49). SAM Seamless Network leads on our overall score (62/100 against 49/100), domain rating (86/100 against 66/100), LinkedIn following (10,486 against 6,696).
What do real users say about Field Effect and SAM Seamless Network?
SAM Seamless Network: 3 positive and 0 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/newsbotFUNDING.
Read the full Field Effect review and pricing or the SAM Seamless Network review and pricing. You can also browse other Field Effect alternatives we track.