Field Effect vs OPSWAT
Field Effect vs OPSWAT, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Field Effect is on 49/100 and OPSWAT on 70/100.
Where each one leads
Field Effect
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
OPSWAT
- our overall score: 70/100 against 49/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 66/100
- headcount: 1,159 against 150
- LinkedIn following: 131,451 against 6,696
At a glance
| Measure | Field Effect | OPSWAT |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cybersecurity platform for operational technology (OT) and industrial control systems. | Global cybersecurity company protecting critical infrastructure with AI-powered threat prevention. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Industrial IoT, OT Security, ICS Security | Cybersecurity, Critical Infrastructure Protection, Endpoint Security, Network Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2002 |
| Headquarters | Ottawa, Canada | Tampa, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Field Effect | OPSWAT |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 150 | 1,159 |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,696 | 131,451 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Field Effect | OPSWAT |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 49/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 66/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Field Effect | OPSWAT |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot, Freshdesk | Not detected |
Field Effect vs OPSWAT: common questions
Which is better, Field Effect or OPSWAT?
On our 0-100 score OPSWAT rates higher (70/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Field Effect and OPSWAT compare on the numbers?
OPSWAT leads on our overall score (70/100 against 49/100), domain rating (76/100 against 66/100), headcount (1,159 against 150), LinkedIn following (131,451 against 6,696).
Read the full Field Effect review and pricing or the OPSWAT review and pricing. You can also browse other Field Effect alternatives we track.