Field Effect vs Nozomi Networks
Field Effect vs Nozomi Networks, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Field Effect is on 49/100 and Nozomi Networks on 71/100.
Where each one leads
Field Effect
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Nozomi Networks
- our overall score: 71/100 against 49/100
- headcount: 393 against 150
- LinkedIn following: 99,422 against 6,696
At a glance
| Measure | Field Effect | Nozomi Networks |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cybersecurity platform for operational technology (OT) and industrial control systems. | Cybersecurity and operational visibility for industrial control systems. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Industrial IoT, OT Security, ICS Security | Cybersecurity, Industrial IoT, Threat Detection, Operational Technology Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Ottawa, Canada | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Field Effect | Nozomi Networks |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 150 | 393 |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,696 | 99,422 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Field Effect | Nozomi Networks |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 49/100 | 71/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 7/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 66/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Field Effect | Nozomi Networks |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot, Freshdesk | HubSpot |
Field Effect vs Nozomi Networks: common questions
Which is better, Field Effect or Nozomi Networks?
On our 0-100 score Nozomi Networks rates higher (71/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Field Effect and Nozomi Networks compare on the numbers?
Nozomi Networks leads on our overall score (71/100 against 49/100), headcount (393 against 150), LinkedIn following (99,422 against 6,696).
Read the full Field Effect review and pricing or the Nozomi Networks review and pricing. You can also browse other Field Effect alternatives we track.