Fermata vs GreenEye Technology
Fermata vs GreenEye Technology, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Fermata is on 54/100 and GreenEye Technology on 60/100.
Where each one leads
Fermata
- agent readiness: 37/100 against 21/100
- headcount growth: +50.3% against +28.1%
GreenEye Technology
- our overall score: 60/100 against 54/100
- domain rating: 37/100 against 31/100
- headcount: 52 against 40
- funding raised: $49.0M against $10.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Fermata | GreenEye Technology |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered plant monitoring solutions for precise greenhouse management. | AI-powered precision spraying for sustainable and profitable crop protection. |
| Category | Agritech, Disease Control, Crop Monitoring, Greenhouse | Agritech, Monitor, Pest Control, AgTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2019 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Fermata | GreenEye Technology |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 40 | 52 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +50.3% | +28.1% |
| Total funding | $10.0M | $49.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,797 | 6,393 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Fermata | GreenEye Technology |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 51/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 50/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 31/100 | 37/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Fermata | GreenEye Technology |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Self Managed |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Astro, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | PostHog | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Fermata vs GreenEye Technology: common questions
Which is better, Fermata or GreenEye Technology?
On our 0-100 score GreenEye Technology rates higher (60/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Fermata and GreenEye Technology compare on the numbers?
Fermata leads on agent readiness (37/100 against 21/100), headcount growth (+50.3% against +28.1%). GreenEye Technology leads on our overall score (60/100 against 54/100), domain rating (37/100 against 31/100), headcount (52 against 40), funding raised ($49.0M against $10.0M).
Read the full Fermata review and pricing or the GreenEye Technology review and pricing. You can also browse other Fermata alternatives we track.