Fermata Energy vs InCharge Energy
Fermata Energy vs InCharge Energy, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Fermata Energy is on 54/100 and InCharge Energy on 48/100.
Where each one leads
Fermata Energy
- our overall score: 54/100 against 48/100
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 46/100
InCharge Energy
- headcount: 243 against 38
- funding raised: $56.0M against $40.0M
- LinkedIn following: 17,632 against 8,762
At a glance
| Measure | Fermata Energy | InCharge Energy |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Intelligent energy storage and grid services provider for commercial and industrial facilities. | Provider of EV charging and energy solutions. |
| Category | Energy Storage, Climate Tech, Smart Grid, Battery Technology | Electric Vehicles, Energy, Sustainability, EV Charging |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B2C |
| Offering | Software | hardware | services | Services |
| Founded | 2010 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Hoboken, United States | Los Angeles, USA |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Fermata Energy | InCharge Energy |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 38 | 243 |
| Total funding | $40.0M | $56.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Funding Round |
| LinkedIn followers | 8,762 | 17,632 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Fermata Energy | InCharge Energy |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 48/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 59/100 |
| Search visibility | 42/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 56/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Fermata Energy | InCharge Energy |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vultr | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
Fermata Energy vs InCharge Energy: common questions
Which is better, Fermata Energy or InCharge Energy?
On our 0-100 score Fermata Energy rates higher (54/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Fermata Energy and InCharge Energy compare on the numbers?
Fermata Energy leads on our overall score (54/100 against 48/100), agent readiness (52/100 against 46/100). InCharge Energy leads on headcount (243 against 38), funding raised ($56.0M against $40.0M), LinkedIn following (17,632 against 8,762).
Read the full Fermata Energy review and pricing or the InCharge Energy review and pricing. You can also browse other Fermata Energy alternatives we track.