FDNA vs Scopio Labs
FDNA vs Scopio Labs, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: FDNA is on 59/100 and Scopio Labs on 61/100.
Where each one leads
FDNA
- domain rating: 45/100 against 37/100
- headcount growth: +15.0% against +9.8%
Scopio Labs
- headcount: 163 against 43
- funding raised: $125M against $25.0M
- LinkedIn following: 29,818 against 3,123
At a glance
| Measure | FDNA | Scopio Labs |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Detecting rare diseases early with the help of AI Imagine a world where every person’s genome serves as their medical record to guide health decisions. | Scopio Labs transforms cell morphology analysis with fully digital platforms and diagnostic support for faster, more accurate disease detection. |
| Category | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, Phenotype, Facial | Healthcare, Diagnostics, Computational Microscopes, Medical Imaging |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2010 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Boston, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | FDNA | Scopio Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 43 | 163 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +15.0% | +9.8% |
| Total funding | $25.0M | $125M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,123 | 29,818 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | FDNA | Scopio Labs |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 59/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 45/100 | 37/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | FDNA | Scopio Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Self Managed |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel |
| Support stack | Not detected | Zendesk |
FDNA vs Scopio Labs: common questions
Which is better, FDNA or Scopio Labs?
On our 0-100 score Scopio Labs rates higher (61/100 against 59/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do FDNA and Scopio Labs compare on the numbers?
FDNA leads on domain rating (45/100 against 37/100), headcount growth (+15.0% against +9.8%). Scopio Labs leads on headcount (163 against 43), funding raised ($125M against $25.0M), LinkedIn following (29,818 against 3,123).
Read the full FDNA review and pricing or the Scopio Labs review and pricing. You can also browse other FDNA alternatives we track.