Fast Metals vs Re Sustainability
Fast Metals vs Re Sustainability, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Fast Metals is on 46/100 and Re Sustainability on 47/100.
Where each one leads
Fast Metals
- funding raised: $4.3M against $1.5M
Re Sustainability
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Fast Metals | Re Sustainability |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Extracting critical minerals from industrial waste like red mud using a proprietary chemical process. | A platform focused on enabling businesses to achieve and report on sustainability goals. |
| Category | Climate Tech, Materials Science, Mining, Waste Management | Sustainability, Climate Tech, ESG Reporting, Enterprise Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Software |
| Founded | 2024 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Stamford, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Fast Metals | Re Sustainability |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 2,698 |
| Total funding | $4.3M | $1.5M |
| Latest round | Pre-Seed | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 68,364 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Fast Metals | Re Sustainability |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 46/100 | 47/100 |
| Traction | 33/100 | 51/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 52/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | F (32/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 33/100 | 35/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Fast Metals | Re Sustainability |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Fast Metals vs Re Sustainability: common questions
Which is better, Fast Metals or Re Sustainability?
On our 0-100 score Re Sustainability rates higher (47/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Fast Metals and Re Sustainability compare on the numbers?
Fast Metals leads on funding raised ($4.3M against $1.5M).
Read the full Fast Metals review and pricing or the Re Sustainability review and pricing. You can also browse other Fast Metals alternatives we track.