Fast Metals vs LanzaTech
Fast Metals vs LanzaTech, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Fast Metals is on 46/100 and LanzaTech on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Fast Metals
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
LanzaTech
- our overall score: 53/100 against 46/100
- domain rating: 69/100 against 33/100
- funding raised: $863M against $4.3M
At a glance
| Measure | Fast Metals | LanzaTech |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Extracting critical minerals from industrial waste like red mud using a proprietary chemical process. | LanzaTech transforms waste carbon emissions into valuable products like ethanol, SAF, and chemicals. |
| Category | Climate Tech, Materials Science, Mining, Waste Management | Climate Tech, Energy & Climate Tech, Carbon Capture, Waste Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Platform |
| Founded | 2024 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | Stamford, United States | Skokie, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Fast Metals | LanzaTech |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 255 |
| Total funding | $4.3M | $863M |
| Latest round | Pre-Seed | Private Placement |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 44,276 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Fast Metals | LanzaTech |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 46/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 33/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | 52/100 | 55/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | F (32/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 33/100 | 69/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Fast Metals | LanzaTech |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
Fast Metals vs LanzaTech: common questions
Which is better, Fast Metals or LanzaTech?
On our 0-100 score LanzaTech rates higher (53/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Fast Metals and LanzaTech compare on the numbers?
LanzaTech leads on our overall score (53/100 against 46/100), domain rating (69/100 against 33/100), funding raised ($863M against $4.3M).
Read the full Fast Metals review and pricing or the LanzaTech review and pricing. You can also browse other Fast Metals alternatives we track.