FARMDOK vs SupPlant
FARMDOK vs SupPlant, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: FARMDOK is on 20/100 and SupPlant on 66/100.
Where each one leads
FARMDOK
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
SupPlant
- our overall score: 66/100 against 20/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 38/100 against 33/100
At a glance
| Measure | FARMDOK | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Digital platform for farm management, connecting farmers with agricultural experts and services. | Agritech company providing AI-driven irrigation solutions for water-stressed agriculture, optimizing crop yields and conserving water. |
| Category | AgTech, Farm Management Software, Digital Agriculture, Agronomy | AgTech, Precision Agriculture, Water Management, Crop Optimization |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2017 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Afula, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | FARMDOK | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 55 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -13.4% |
| Total funding | Not published | $62.9M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $30.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 15,340 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | FARMDOK | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 20/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 30/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 2/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 75/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 33/100 | 38/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | FARMDOK | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
FARMDOK vs SupPlant: common questions
Which is better, FARMDOK or SupPlant?
On our 0-100 score SupPlant rates higher (66/100 against 20/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do FARMDOK and SupPlant compare on the numbers?
SupPlant leads on our overall score (66/100 against 20/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 22/100), domain rating (38/100 against 33/100).
Read the full FARMDOK review and pricing or the SupPlant review and pricing. You can also browse other FARMDOK alternatives we track.