Fama vs Remote.com
Fama vs Remote.com, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Fama is on 57/100 and Remote.com on 69/100.
Where each one leads
Fama
- LinkedIn following: 3,532 against 247
Remote.com
- our overall score: 69/100 against 57/100
- agent readiness: 70/100 against 48/100
- domain rating: 79/100 against 54/100
- funding raised: $496M against $10.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Fama | Remote.com |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered platform for analyzing public online data for talent screening and risk mitigation. | Global payroll, HR, compliance, and benefits for distributed teams. |
| Category | Talent Screening, HR Tech, Risk Management, Compliance | HR Tech, Global Payroll, Employer of Record, Compliance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software | platform | services |
| Founded | 2015 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Fama | Remote.com |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 79 | 82 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -26.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $10.0M | $496M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $3.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,532 | 247 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Fama | Remote.com |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | B (70/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 54/100 | 79/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Fama | Remote.com |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot, Zendesk | Not detected |
Fama vs Remote.com: common questions
Which is better, Fama or Remote.com?
On our 0-100 score Remote.com rates higher (69/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Fama and Remote.com compare on the numbers?
Fama leads on LinkedIn following (3,532 against 247). Remote.com leads on our overall score (69/100 against 57/100), agent readiness (70/100 against 48/100), domain rating (79/100 against 54/100), funding raised ($496M against $10.0M).
Read the full Fama review and pricing or the Remote.com review and pricing. You can also browse other Fama alternatives we track.