Failuresagents vs Nagomi Security
Failuresagents vs Nagomi Security, compared side by side on 9 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Failuresagents is on 7/100 and Nagomi Security on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Failuresagents
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Nagomi Security
- our overall score: 63/100 against 7/100
- agent readiness: 39/100 against 31/100
At a glance
| Measure | Failuresagents | Nagomi Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered platform that helps businesses learn from and avoid common failure points in their operations. | Proactive defense platform mapping security tools to threats and providing remediation plans. |
| Category | AI Agent, Agentic AI, Predictive Analytics, Risk Management | Cybersecurity, Enterprise, Threat Detection, Risk Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | Not published | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Not published | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Failuresagents | Nagomi Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 76 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +45.3% |
| Total funding | Not published | $30.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 6,054 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Failuresagents | Nagomi Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 7/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 56/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 3/100 | 46/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (31/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 39/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Failuresagents | Nagomi Security |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Failuresagents vs Nagomi Security: common questions
Which is better, Failuresagents or Nagomi Security?
On our 0-100 score Nagomi Security rates higher (63/100 against 7/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 9 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Failuresagents and Nagomi Security compare on the numbers?
Nagomi Security leads on our overall score (63/100 against 7/100), agent readiness (39/100 against 31/100).
Read the full Failuresagents review and pricing or the Nagomi Security review and pricing. You can also browse other Failuresagents alternatives we track.