Fabrix Security vs Ping Identity
Fabrix Security vs Ping Identity, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Fabrix Security is on 55/100 and Ping Identity on 60/100.
Where each one leads
Fabrix Security
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 45/100
Ping Identity
- our overall score: 60/100 against 55/100
- domain rating: 82/100 against 29/100
- headcount: 2,370 against 18
- funding raised: $111M against $8.0M
- LinkedIn following: 160,033 against 44,272
At a glance
| Measure | Fabrix Security | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-native identity security solution transforming IAM workflows with intelligent agents for real-time, explainable access decisions. | Provider of identity security solutions for the digital enterprise. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Enterprise, Identity & Access, AI Foundation & Compute | Identity & Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity, Identity & Access Management, Authentication |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2023 | 2002 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Denver, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Fabrix Security | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 18 | 2,370 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +21.9% |
| Total funding | $8.0M | $111M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | 44,272 | 160,033 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Fabrix Security | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 47/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 50/100 |
| Community | 33/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 41/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 29/100 | 82/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Fabrix Security | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Fabrix Security | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Identity Visibility and Intelligence, Smarter User Access Reviews, Proactive ISPM, Streamlined Access Requests, Identity Lifecycle Management, Govern Non-Human Identities | Not published |
What users say
| Measure | Fabrix Security | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 5.0/5 from 2 votes | Not published |
Fabrix Security vs Ping Identity: common questions
Which is better, Fabrix Security or Ping Identity?
On our 0-100 score Ping Identity rates higher (60/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Fabrix Security and Ping Identity compare on the numbers?
Fabrix Security leads on agent readiness (51/100 against 45/100). Ping Identity leads on our overall score (60/100 against 55/100), domain rating (82/100 against 29/100), headcount (2,370 against 18), funding raised ($111M against $8.0M), LinkedIn following (160,033 against 44,272).
Read the full Fabrix Security review and pricing or the Ping Identity review and pricing. You can also browse other Fabrix Security alternatives we track.