Fabrix Security vs Okta
Fabrix Security vs Okta, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Fabrix Security is on 55/100 and Okta on 70/100.
Where each one leads
Fabrix Security
- headcount: 18 against 3
Okta
- our overall score: 70/100 against 55/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 29/100
- funding raised: $187M against $8.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Fabrix Security | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-native identity security solution transforming IAM workflows with intelligent agents for real-time, explainable access decisions. | Cloud-based identity and access management platform for secure user authentication and application access. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Enterprise, Identity & Access, AI Foundation & Compute | SaaS, Cybersecurity, Cloud, Agentic AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2023 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Fabrix Security | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 18 | 3 |
| Total funding | $8.0M | $187M |
| Latest round | Not published | IPO |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.5B |
| LinkedIn followers | 44,272 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Fabrix Security | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | 47/100 | 46/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 90/100 |
| Community | 33/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 41/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 90/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 29/100 | 90/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Fabrix Security | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Fabrix Security | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Identity Visibility and Intelligence, Smarter User Access Reviews, Proactive ISPM, Streamlined Access Requests, Identity Lifecycle Management, Govern Non-Human Identities | Not published |
What users say
| Measure | Fabrix Security | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 5.0/5 from 2 votes | Not published |
Fabrix Security vs Okta: common questions
Which is better, Fabrix Security or Okta?
On our 0-100 score Okta rates higher (70/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Fabrix Security and Okta compare on the numbers?
Fabrix Security leads on headcount (18 against 3). Okta leads on our overall score (70/100 against 55/100), domain rating (90/100 against 29/100), funding raised ($187M against $8.0M).
Read the full Fabrix Security review and pricing or the Okta review and pricing. You can also browse other Fabrix Security alternatives we track.