Fabrix Security vs Obsidian Security
Fabrix Security vs Obsidian Security, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Fabrix Security is on 55/100 and Obsidian Security on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Fabrix Security
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 40/100
Obsidian Security
- our overall score: 63/100 against 55/100
- funding raised: $85.0M against $8.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Fabrix Security | Obsidian Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-native identity security solution transforming IAM workflows with intelligent agents for real-time, explainable access decisions. | Obsidian Security provides a cybersecurity platform focused on securing autonomous AI agents and their access to cloud applications. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Enterprise, Identity & Access, AI Foundation & Compute | Cybersecurity, Artificial Intelligence, AI Agent, SaaS Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2023 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Palo Alto, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Fabrix Security | Obsidian Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 18 | Not published |
| Total funding | $8.0M | $85.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 44,272 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Fabrix Security | Obsidian Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 47/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 33/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 41/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 29/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Fabrix Security | Obsidian Security |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment, Facebook Pixel |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Fabrix Security | Obsidian Security |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Identity Visibility and Intelligence, Smarter User Access Reviews, Proactive ISPM, Streamlined Access Requests, Identity Lifecycle Management, Govern Non-Human Identities | Not published |
What users say
| Measure | Fabrix Security | Obsidian Security |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 5.0/5 from 2 votes | Not published |
Fabrix Security vs Obsidian Security: common questions
Which is better, Fabrix Security or Obsidian Security?
On our 0-100 score Obsidian Security rates higher (63/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Fabrix Security and Obsidian Security compare on the numbers?
Fabrix Security leads on agent readiness (51/100 against 40/100). Obsidian Security leads on our overall score (63/100 against 55/100), funding raised ($85.0M against $8.0M).
Read the full Fabrix Security review and pricing or the Obsidian Security review and pricing. You can also browse other Fabrix Security alternatives we track.