F Secure vs Webroot
F Secure vs Webroot, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: F Secure is on 54/100 and Webroot on 50/100.
Where each one leads
F Secure
- our overall score: 54/100 against 50/100
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 36/100
Webroot
- funding raised: $109M against $39.9M
At a glance
| Measure | F Secure | Webroot |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Finnish cybersecurity company providing award-winning security and privacy solutions for consumers. | Cloud-based cybersecurity solutions for individuals and businesses, leveraging AI and threat intelligence. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Endpoint Security, Privacy Protection, VPN | Cybersecurity, Endpoint Security, Threat Detection, Cloud Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 1988 | 1997 |
| Headquarters | Helsinki, Finland | Broomfield, United States |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | F Secure | Webroot |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,772 | Not published |
| Total funding | $39.9M | $109M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 60,358 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | F Secure | Webroot |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 50/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 16/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | F (36/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 83/100 | 80/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | F Secure | Webroot |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | Vercel |
| CDN | Netlify | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Next.js, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
F Secure vs Webroot: common questions
Which is better, F Secure or Webroot?
On our 0-100 score F Secure rates higher (54/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do F Secure and Webroot compare on the numbers?
F Secure leads on our overall score (54/100 against 50/100), agent readiness (45/100 against 36/100). Webroot leads on funding raised ($109M against $39.9M).
Read the full F Secure review and pricing or the Webroot review and pricing. You can also browse other F Secure alternatives we track.

