F.A.S.T. Data vs Instapage
F.A.S.T. Data vs Instapage, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: F.A.S.T. Data is on 25/100 and Instapage on 63/100.
Where each one leads
F.A.S.T. Data
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Instapage
- our overall score: 63/100 against 25/100
- agent readiness: 64/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 85/100 against 1/100
- headcount: 78 against 15
- LinkedIn following: 22,027 against 78
At a glance
| Measure | F.A.S.T. Data | Instapage |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Marketing technology firm specializing in consumer finance. | AI-powered platform for creating high-converting landing pages and websites. |
| Category | MarTech, AdTech, Fintech, Consumer Finance | MarTech, AdTech, Landing Page Builder, Website Builder |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2021 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | F.A.S.T. Data | Instapage |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 15 | 78 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -58.2% |
| Total funding | Not published | $18.6M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 78 | 22,027 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | F.A.S.T. Data | Instapage |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 25/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 12/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 29/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 35/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | C (64/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 1/100 | 85/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | F.A.S.T. Data | Instapage |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
F.A.S.T. Data vs Instapage: common questions
Which is better, F.A.S.T. Data or Instapage?
On our 0-100 score Instapage rates higher (63/100 against 25/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do F.A.S.T. Data and Instapage compare on the numbers?
Instapage leads on our overall score (63/100 against 25/100), agent readiness (64/100 against 21/100), domain rating (85/100 against 1/100), headcount (78 against 15), LinkedIn following (22,027 against 78).
Read the full F.A.S.T. Data review and pricing or the Instapage review and pricing. You can also browse other F.A.S.T. Data alternatives we track.