F.A.S.T. Data vs Humanz
F.A.S.T. Data vs Humanz, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: F.A.S.T. Data is on 25/100 and Humanz on 62/100.
Where each one leads
F.A.S.T. Data
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Humanz
- our overall score: 62/100 against 25/100
- agent readiness: 30/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 61/100 against 1/100
- headcount: 223 against 15
- LinkedIn following: 14,415 against 78
At a glance
| Measure | F.A.S.T. Data | Humanz |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Marketing technology firm specializing in consumer finance. | AI-powered platform for global influencer marketing campaign management. |
| Category | MarTech, AdTech, Fintech, Consumer Finance | MarTech, AdTech, Creator Economy, Influencer Marketing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software | platform |
| Founded | 2021 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | F.A.S.T. Data | Humanz |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 15 | 223 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +64.1% |
| Total funding | Not published | $32.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 78 | 14,415 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | F.A.S.T. Data | Humanz |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 25/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 12/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 29/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 35/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (30/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 1/100 | 61/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | F.A.S.T. Data | Humanz |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Self Managed |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
F.A.S.T. Data vs Humanz: common questions
Which is better, F.A.S.T. Data or Humanz?
On our 0-100 score Humanz rates higher (62/100 against 25/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do F.A.S.T. Data and Humanz compare on the numbers?
Humanz leads on our overall score (62/100 against 25/100), agent readiness (30/100 against 21/100), domain rating (61/100 against 1/100), headcount (223 against 15), LinkedIn following (14,415 against 78).
Read the full F.A.S.T. Data review and pricing or the Humanz review and pricing. You can also browse other F.A.S.T. Data alternatives we track.