F.A.S.T. Data vs Goldcast
F.A.S.T. Data vs Goldcast, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: F.A.S.T. Data is on 25/100 and Goldcast on 63/100.
Where each one leads
F.A.S.T. Data
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Goldcast
- our overall score: 63/100 against 25/100
- agent readiness: 37/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 79/100 against 1/100
- headcount: 191 against 15
- LinkedIn following: 29,300 against 78
At a glance
| Measure | F.A.S.T. Data | Goldcast |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Marketing technology firm specializing in consumer finance. | AI-first video content platform for B2B marketers to host webinars, virtual events, and repurpose video. |
| Category | MarTech, AdTech, Fintech, Consumer Finance | MarTech, AdTech, B2B SaaS, Video Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2021 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Toronto, Canada |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | F.A.S.T. Data | Goldcast |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 15 | 191 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -25.3% |
| Total funding | Not published | $38.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 78 | 29,300 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | F.A.S.T. Data | Goldcast |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 25/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 12/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 29/100 | 40/100 |
| Quality | 35/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 1/100 | 79/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | F.A.S.T. Data | Goldcast |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Sveltekit, Svelte, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
F.A.S.T. Data vs Goldcast: common questions
Which is better, F.A.S.T. Data or Goldcast?
On our 0-100 score Goldcast rates higher (63/100 against 25/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do F.A.S.T. Data and Goldcast compare on the numbers?
Goldcast leads on our overall score (63/100 against 25/100), agent readiness (37/100 against 21/100), domain rating (79/100 against 1/100), headcount (191 against 15), LinkedIn following (29,300 against 78).
Read the full F.A.S.T. Data review and pricing or the Goldcast review and pricing. You can also browse other F.A.S.T. Data alternatives we track.