Eyezon vs Trigo
Eyezon vs Trigo, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Eyezon is on 42/100 and Trigo on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Eyezon
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Trigo
- our overall score: 62/100 against 42/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 53/100 against 2/100
- headcount: 230 against 5
- funding raised: $199M against $1.0M
- LinkedIn following: 19,975 against 151
At a glance
| Measure | Eyezon | Trigo |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Revolutionizing physical store checkout with frictionless, AI-powered computer vision technology. | Computer vision startup automating retail checkout with AI-powered item identification. |
| Category | Retail, RetailTech, Computer Vision, Deep Learning | Retail, Visual Monitor, Checkout, Cashierless |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Eyezon | Trigo |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 5 | 230 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +0.9% |
| Total funding | $1.0M | $199M |
| Latest round | Seed | Funding Round |
| LinkedIn followers | 151 | 19,975 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Eyezon | Trigo |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 42/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 38/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 55/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 2/100 | 53/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Eyezon | Trigo |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Support stack | Not detected | Zendesk |
Eyezon vs Trigo: common questions
Which is better, Eyezon or Trigo?
On our 0-100 score Trigo rates higher (62/100 against 42/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Eyezon and Trigo compare on the numbers?
Trigo leads on our overall score (62/100 against 42/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 21/100), domain rating (53/100 against 2/100), headcount (230 against 5), funding raised ($199M against $1.0M), LinkedIn following (19,975 against 151).
Read the full Eyezon review and pricing or the Trigo review and pricing. You can also browse other Eyezon alternatives we track.