EyeControl vs Inner Cosmos
EyeControl vs Inner Cosmos, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: EyeControl is on 49/100 and Inner Cosmos on 54/100.
Where each one leads
EyeControl
- domain rating: 41/100 against 26/100
- headcount: 22 against 15
- funding raised: $20.0M against $10.0M
Inner Cosmos
- our overall score: 54/100 against 49/100
- headcount growth: +2.1% against -2.7%
- LinkedIn following: 1,815 against 537
At a glance
| Measure | EyeControl | Inner Cosmos |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered communication solutions for individuals with severe motor disabilities. | Developing a digital pill to rebalance brain networks using imperceptible micro-stimulations. |
| Category | Healthcare, Vision Impairment, Image Processing, AR VR | Healthcare, Brain, Sensor, Human Machine Interface |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | EyeControl | Inner Cosmos |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 22 | 15 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -2.7% | +2.1% |
| Total funding | $20.0M | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 537 | 1,815 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | EyeControl | Inner Cosmos |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 49/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 47/100 |
| Team | 10/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 29/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 41/100 | 26/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | EyeControl | Inner Cosmos |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Hetzner |
| CMS | Wix | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Hotjar |
| Open source | Yes | No |
EyeControl vs Inner Cosmos: common questions
Which is better, EyeControl or Inner Cosmos?
On our 0-100 score Inner Cosmos rates higher (54/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do EyeControl and Inner Cosmos compare on the numbers?
EyeControl leads on domain rating (41/100 against 26/100), headcount (22 against 15), funding raised ($20.0M against $10.0M). Inner Cosmos leads on our overall score (54/100 against 49/100), headcount growth (+2.1% against -2.7%), LinkedIn following (1,815 against 537).
Read the full EyeControl review and pricing or the Inner Cosmos review and pricing. You can also browse other EyeControl alternatives we track.