EyeClick vs Wildlife Studios
EyeClick vs Wildlife Studios, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: EyeClick is on 21/100 and Wildlife Studios on 68/100.
Where each one leads
EyeClick
- headcount growth: +3.0% against -12.4%
Wildlife Studios
- our overall score: 68/100 against 21/100
- agent readiness: 37/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 61/100 against 39/100
- headcount: 458 against 58
- LinkedIn following: 144,176 against 6,196
At a glance
| Measure | EyeClick | Wildlife Studios |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | BEAM transforms spaces into immersive play areas with interactive projector games for all ages. | Global mobile game developer and publisher creating engaging free-to-play games for billions of players. |
| Category | Gaming, Youth, Interactive Technology, EdTech | Gaming, Mobile Games, Game Development, Game Publishing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Software |
| Founded | 2004 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | São Paulo, Brazil |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | EyeClick | Wildlife Studios |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 58 | 458 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +3.0% | -12.4% |
| Total funding | Not published | $450M |
| Latest round | Bootstrapped | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $3.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,196 | 144,176 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | EyeClick | Wildlife Studios |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 21/100 | 68/100 |
| Traction | 18/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 39/100 | 61/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | EyeClick | Wildlife Studios |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | AWS |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar |
EyeClick vs Wildlife Studios: common questions
Which is better, EyeClick or Wildlife Studios?
On our 0-100 score Wildlife Studios rates higher (68/100 against 21/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do EyeClick and Wildlife Studios compare on the numbers?
EyeClick leads on headcount growth (+3.0% against -12.4%). Wildlife Studios leads on our overall score (68/100 against 21/100), agent readiness (37/100 against 21/100), domain rating (61/100 against 39/100), headcount (458 against 58), LinkedIn following (144,176 against 6,196).
Read the full EyeClick review and pricing or the Wildlife Studios review and pricing. You can also browse other EyeClick alternatives we track.