Expo vs MacPaw
Expo vs MacPaw, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Expo is on 58/100 and MacPaw on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Expo
- our overall score: 58/100 against 54/100
- agent readiness: 64/100 against 37/100
MacPaw
- headcount: 502 against 358
- funding raised: $63.0M against $45.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Expo | MacPaw |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An open-source tool for building cross-platform applications. | Develops and maintains a suite of macOS and iOS applications. |
| Category | Software, Developer Tools, Mobile Development | Software, Artificial Intelligence, Consumer Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2008 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, USA | Kyiv, Ukraine |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Expo | MacPaw |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 358 | 502 |
| Total funding | $45.0M | $63.0M |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Series B |
| Valuation | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 37,213 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Expo | MacPaw |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 59/100 |
| Search visibility | 21/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (64/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 87/100 | 80/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Expo | MacPaw |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Laravel |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Expo vs MacPaw: common questions
Which is better, Expo or MacPaw?
On our 0-100 score Expo rates higher (58/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Expo and MacPaw compare on the numbers?
Expo leads on our overall score (58/100 against 54/100), agent readiness (64/100 against 37/100). MacPaw leads on headcount (502 against 358), funding raised ($63.0M against $45.0M).
Read the full Expo review and pricing or the MacPaw review and pricing. You can also browse other Expo alternatives we track.