Expedia vs Stasher
Expedia vs Stasher, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Expedia is on 76/100 and Stasher on 52/100.
Where each one leads
Expedia
- our overall score: 76/100 against 52/100
- domain rating: 80/100 against 71/100
- headcount: 21,887 against 42
- funding raised: $4.2B against $2.7M
- LinkedIn following: 923,629 against 7,136
Stasher
- agent readiness: 43/100 against 37/100
At a glance
| Measure | Expedia | Stasher |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global online travel company offering flights, hotels, car rentals, cruises, activities, and vacation rentals. | Stasher is a platform that connects travelers with local businesses to store luggage. |
| Category | Travel Tech, Marketplace, E-commerce, Consumer App | Travel Tech, Marketplace, Logistics, Consumer App |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Marketplace |
| Founded | 1996 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Seattle, United States | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Expedia | Stasher |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 21,887 | 42 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +2.7% | Not published |
| Total funding | $4.2B | $2.7M |
| Latest round | Post IPO Debt | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 923,629 | 7,136 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Expedia | Stasher |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 76/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 48/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | 90/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 80/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Expedia | Stasher |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, React |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
Expedia vs Stasher: common questions
Which is better, Expedia or Stasher?
On our 0-100 score Expedia rates higher (76/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Expedia and Stasher compare on the numbers?
Expedia leads on our overall score (76/100 against 52/100), domain rating (80/100 against 71/100), headcount (21,887 against 42), funding raised ($4.2B against $2.7M), LinkedIn following (923,629 against 7,136). Stasher leads on agent readiness (43/100 against 37/100).
Read the full Expedia review and pricing or the Stasher review and pricing. You can also browse other Expedia alternatives we track.