Exo Technologies vs Swift Navigation
Exo Technologies vs Swift Navigation, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Exo Technologies is on 35/100 and Swift Navigation on 47/100.
Where each one leads
Exo Technologies
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Swift Navigation
- our overall score: 47/100 against 35/100
- agent readiness: 39/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 55/100 against 14/100
- headcount: 132 against 6
At a glance
| Measure | Exo Technologies | Swift Navigation |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Israeli startup providing high-accuracy, low-cost GPS solutions for smart mobility. | High-accuracy GNSS and precise positioning solutions for autonomous vehicles and robotics. |
| Category | Automotive, Connected Vehicle, GPS, Satellite | GNSS, Precise Positioning, Autonomous Vehicles, Robotics |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2G | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Hardware |
| Founded | 2015 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Exo Technologies | Swift Navigation |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 6 | 132 |
| Total funding | Not published | $105M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series E |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 10,622 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Exo Technologies | Swift Navigation |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 35/100 | 47/100 |
| Traction | 8/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 20/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 12/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 48/100 | 50/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 14/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Exo Technologies | Swift Navigation |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Jetpack Stats |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Exo Technologies vs Swift Navigation: common questions
Which is better, Exo Technologies or Swift Navigation?
On our 0-100 score Swift Navigation rates higher (47/100 against 35/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Exo Technologies and Swift Navigation compare on the numbers?
Swift Navigation leads on our overall score (47/100 against 35/100), agent readiness (39/100 against 21/100), domain rating (55/100 against 14/100), headcount (132 against 6).
Read the full Exo Technologies review and pricing or the Swift Navigation review and pricing. You can also browse other Exo Technologies alternatives we track.