Exafunction vs ModelOp
Exafunction vs ModelOp, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Exafunction is on 53/100 and ModelOp on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Exafunction
- domain rating: 82/100 against 61/100
- headcount: 442 against 41
- funding raised: $28.0M against $16.0M
- LinkedIn following: 78,962 against 6,843
ModelOp
- our overall score: 61/100 against 53/100
- agent readiness: 55/100 against 29/100
At a glance
| Measure | Exafunction | ModelOp |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Exafunction provides a platform for deploying, managing, and scaling AI models and machine learning infrastructure. | ModelOp's Enterprise AI Command Center unifies every AI asset, automating delivery and maximizing ROI for ML, GenAI, and agentic AI in production. |
| Category | MLOps, AI Infrastructure, Developer Tools, Cloud Infrastructure | MLOps, AI Governance, AI Observability, Enterprise Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Chicago, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Exafunction | ModelOp |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 442 | 41 |
| Total funding | $28.0M | $16.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 78,962 | 6,843 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Exafunction | ModelOp |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 52/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 26/100 | 42/100 |
| Quality | 60/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (29/100) | D (55/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 82/100 | 61/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Exafunction | ModelOp |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Segment, Microsoft Clarity |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Exafunction vs ModelOp: common questions
Which is better, Exafunction or ModelOp?
On our 0-100 score ModelOp rates higher (61/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Exafunction and ModelOp compare on the numbers?
Exafunction leads on domain rating (82/100 against 61/100), headcount (442 against 41), funding raised ($28.0M against $16.0M), LinkedIn following (78,962 against 6,843). ModelOp leads on our overall score (61/100 against 53/100), agent readiness (55/100 against 29/100).
Read the full Exafunction review and pricing or the ModelOp review and pricing. You can also browse other Exafunction alternatives we track.