Exabeam vs Gutsy
Exabeam vs Gutsy, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Exabeam is on 69/100 and Gutsy on 60/100.
Where each one leads
Exabeam
- our overall score: 69/100 against 60/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 33/100
- headcount: 794 against 34
- funding raised: $390M against $51.0M
- LinkedIn following: 51,918 against 1,535
Gutsy
- headcount growth: +500.0% against +2.8%
At a glance
| Measure | Exabeam | Gutsy |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Exabeam provides a cloud-native cybersecurity platform combining SIEM and UEBA to detect, investigate, and respond to threats using AI. | Gutsy applies process mining to enterprise cybersecurity to improve tool integration and outcomes. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Information Technology (IT) | Cybersecurity, Process Mining, Security Governance, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Foster City, United States | Baton Rouge, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Exabeam | Gutsy |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 794 | 34 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +2.8% | +500.0% |
| Total funding | $390M | $51.0M |
| Latest round | Series F | Seed |
| Valuation | $2.4B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 51,918 | 1,535 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Exabeam | Gutsy |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 90/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 33/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Exabeam | Gutsy |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Matomo | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Exabeam vs Gutsy: common questions
Which is better, Exabeam or Gutsy?
On our 0-100 score Exabeam rates higher (69/100 against 60/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Exabeam and Gutsy compare on the numbers?
Exabeam leads on our overall score (69/100 against 60/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 21/100), domain rating (76/100 against 33/100), headcount (794 against 34), funding raised ($390M against $51.0M), LinkedIn following (51,918 against 1,535). Gutsy leads on headcount growth (+500.0% against +2.8%).
Read the full Exabeam review and pricing or the Gutsy review and pricing. You can also browse other Exabeam alternatives we track.