Exabeam vs ThreatMatrix
Exabeam vs ThreatMatrix, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Exabeam is on 69/100 and ThreatMatrix on 50/100.
Where each one leads
Exabeam
- our overall score: 69/100 against 50/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 25/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 0/100
ThreatMatrix
- funding raised: $865M against $390M
At a glance
| Measure | Exabeam | ThreatMatrix |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Exabeam provides a cloud-native cybersecurity platform combining SIEM and UEBA to detect, investigate, and respond to threats using AI. | Behavioral analytics for detecting insider threats. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Information Technology (IT) | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Behavioral Analytics, Insider Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Foster City, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Exabeam | ThreatMatrix |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 794 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +2.8% | Not published |
| Total funding | $390M | $865M |
| Latest round | Series F | Merger/Acquisition |
| Valuation | $2.4B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 51,918 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Exabeam | ThreatMatrix |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 50/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | F (25/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 0/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Exabeam | ThreatMatrix |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS | Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Matomo | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Exabeam vs ThreatMatrix: common questions
Which is better, Exabeam or ThreatMatrix?
On our 0-100 score Exabeam rates higher (69/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Exabeam and ThreatMatrix compare on the numbers?
Exabeam leads on our overall score (69/100 against 50/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 25/100), domain rating (76/100 against 0/100). ThreatMatrix leads on funding raised ($865M against $390M).
Read the full Exabeam review and pricing or the ThreatMatrix review and pricing. You can also browse other Exabeam alternatives we track.