Exabeam vs StreamSights
Exabeam vs StreamSights, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Exabeam is on 69/100 and StreamSights on 30/100.
Where each one leads
Exabeam
- our overall score: 69/100 against 30/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 41/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 7/100
- headcount: 794 against 2
- LinkedIn following: 51,918 against 56
StreamSights
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Exabeam | StreamSights |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Exabeam provides a cloud-native cybersecurity platform combining SIEM and UEBA to detect, investigate, and respond to threats using AI. | AI-powered behavioral and content analysis for enterprise cybersecurity. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Information Technology (IT) | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Data Protection, No Code |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Foster City, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Exabeam | StreamSights |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 794 | 2 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +2.8% | Not published |
| Total funding | $390M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series F | Not published |
| Valuation | $2.4B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 51,918 | 56 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Exabeam | StreamSights |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 30/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 5/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 24/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 7/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Exabeam | StreamSights |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Payments | Not detected | Apple PAY |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Matomo | Google Analytics 4 |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Exabeam vs StreamSights: common questions
Which is better, Exabeam or StreamSights?
On our 0-100 score Exabeam rates higher (69/100 against 30/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Exabeam and StreamSights compare on the numbers?
Exabeam leads on our overall score (69/100 against 30/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 41/100), domain rating (76/100 against 7/100), headcount (794 against 2), LinkedIn following (51,918 against 56).
Read the full Exabeam review and pricing or the StreamSights review and pricing. You can also browse other Exabeam alternatives we track.