Exabeam vs Otonomic
Exabeam vs Otonomic, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Exabeam is on 69/100 and Otonomic on 41/100.
Where each one leads
Exabeam
- our overall score: 69/100 against 41/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 33/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 14/100
- headcount: 794 against 11
- funding raised: $390M against $1.0M
- LinkedIn following: 51,918 against 155
Otonomic
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Exabeam | Otonomic |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Exabeam provides a cloud-native cybersecurity platform combining SIEM and UEBA to detect, investigate, and respond to threats using AI. | Otonomic provides a 1-click website creation tool for small business owners, leveraging content from their Facebook pages. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Information Technology (IT) | Enterprise, Information Technology (IT), SMB Software, Website Builder |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Foster City, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Exabeam | Otonomic |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 794 | 11 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +2.8% | Not published |
| Total funding | $390M | $1.0M |
| Latest round | Series F | Seed |
| Valuation | $2.4B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 51,918 | 155 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Exabeam | Otonomic |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 41/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 41/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 52/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | F (33/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 14/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Exabeam | Otonomic |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Matomo | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Exabeam vs Otonomic: common questions
Which is better, Exabeam or Otonomic?
On our 0-100 score Exabeam rates higher (69/100 against 41/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Exabeam and Otonomic compare on the numbers?
Exabeam leads on our overall score (69/100 against 41/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 33/100), domain rating (76/100 against 14/100), headcount (794 against 11), funding raised ($390M against $1.0M), LinkedIn following (51,918 against 155).
Read the full Exabeam review and pricing or the Otonomic review and pricing. You can also browse other Exabeam alternatives we track.