Exabeam vs IntSights
Exabeam vs IntSights, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Exabeam is on 69/100 and IntSights on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Exabeam
- our overall score: 69/100 against 62/100
- headcount: 794 against 19
- funding raised: $390M against $71.3M
- LinkedIn following: 51,918 against 11,634
IntSights
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Exabeam | IntSights |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Exabeam provides a cloud-native cybersecurity platform combining SIEM and UEBA to detect, investigate, and respond to threats using AI. | Cyber threat intelligence platform detecting and analyzing threats across the open, deep, and dark web. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Information Technology (IT) | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Cyber Intelligence, Dark Web |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Foster City, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Exabeam | IntSights |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 794 | 19 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +2.8% | Not published |
| Total funding | $390M | $71.3M |
| Latest round | Series F | Series D |
| Valuation | $2.4B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 51,918 | 11,634 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Exabeam | IntSights |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 52/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 83/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Exabeam | IntSights |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Matomo | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Exabeam vs IntSights: common questions
Which is better, Exabeam or IntSights?
On our 0-100 score Exabeam rates higher (69/100 against 62/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Exabeam and IntSights compare on the numbers?
Exabeam leads on our overall score (69/100 against 62/100), headcount (794 against 19), funding raised ($390M against $71.3M), LinkedIn following (51,918 against 11,634).
Read the full Exabeam review and pricing or the IntSights review and pricing. You can also browse other Exabeam alternatives we track.