Exabeam vs InCyber
Exabeam vs InCyber, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Exabeam is on 69/100 and InCyber on 41/100.
Where each one leads
Exabeam
- our overall score: 69/100 against 41/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 1/100
- headcount: 794 against 2
- LinkedIn following: 51,918 against 91
InCyber
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Exabeam | InCyber |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Exabeam provides a cloud-native cybersecurity platform combining SIEM and UEBA to detect, investigate, and respond to threats using AI. | Cybersecurity startup focused on detecting and preventing insider threats using a predictive system. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Information Technology (IT) | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Insider Threats |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Foster City, United States | Not published |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Exabeam | InCyber |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 794 | 2 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +2.8% | Not published |
| Total funding | $390M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series F | Not published |
| Valuation | $2.4B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 51,918 | 91 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Exabeam | InCyber |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 41/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 35/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 26/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 1/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Exabeam | InCyber |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Matomo | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Exabeam vs InCyber: common questions
Which is better, Exabeam or InCyber?
On our 0-100 score Exabeam rates higher (69/100 against 41/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Exabeam and InCyber compare on the numbers?
Exabeam leads on our overall score (69/100 against 41/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 22/100), domain rating (76/100 against 1/100), headcount (794 against 2), LinkedIn following (51,918 against 91).
Read the full Exabeam review and pricing or the InCyber review and pricing. You can also browse other Exabeam alternatives we track.