Exabeam vs Hunters AI
Exabeam vs Hunters AI, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Exabeam is on 69/100 and Hunters AI on 70/100.
Where each one leads
Exabeam
- domain rating: 76/100 against 61/100
- headcount: 794 against 180
- funding raised: $390M against $118M
- LinkedIn following: 51,918 against 25,421
Hunters AI
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Exabeam | Hunters AI |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Exabeam provides a cloud-native cybersecurity platform combining SIEM and UEBA to detect, investigate, and respond to threats using AI. | AI-powered SOC platform automating threat detection, investigation, and response for security teams. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Information Technology (IT) | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Extended Detection and Response, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Foster City, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Exabeam | Hunters AI |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 794 | 180 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +2.8% | Not published |
| Total funding | $390M | $118M |
| Latest round | Series F | Series C |
| Valuation | $2.4B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 51,918 | 25,421 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Exabeam | Hunters AI |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 56/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 61/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Exabeam | Hunters AI |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Matomo | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Exabeam vs Hunters AI: common questions
Which is better, Exabeam or Hunters AI?
On our 0-100 score Hunters AI rates higher (70/100 against 69/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Exabeam and Hunters AI compare on the numbers?
Exabeam leads on domain rating (76/100 against 61/100), headcount (794 against 180), funding raised ($390M against $118M), LinkedIn following (51,918 against 25,421).
Read the full Exabeam review and pricing or the Hunters AI review and pricing. You can also browse other Exabeam alternatives we track.