Exabeam vs Fortscale
Exabeam vs Fortscale, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Exabeam is on 69/100 and Fortscale on 47/100.
Where each one leads
Exabeam
- our overall score: 69/100 against 47/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 29/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 60/100
- funding raised: $390M against $23.0M
Fortscale
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Exabeam | Fortscale |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Exabeam provides a cloud-native cybersecurity platform combining SIEM and UEBA to detect, investigate, and respond to threats using AI. | Fortscale provides real-time user and entity behavior analytics to detect insider threats and unusual activities. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Information Technology (IT) | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, UBA, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Foster City, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Exabeam | Fortscale |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 794 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +2.8% | Not published |
| Total funding | $390M | $23.0M |
| Latest round | Series F | Series A |
| Valuation | $2.4B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 51,918 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Exabeam | Fortscale |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 47/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 37/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 40/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 12/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | F (29/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 60/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Exabeam | Fortscale |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Matomo | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Exabeam | Fortscale |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread |
“Eliminate Insider Threats with Precision and Speed. Fortscale provides Fortune 2000 enterprises with an industry-leading user behavior analytics platform for superior threat detection.”r/u/threat_detection
Exabeam vs Fortscale: common questions
Which is better, Exabeam or Fortscale?
On our 0-100 score Exabeam rates higher (69/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Exabeam and Fortscale compare on the numbers?
Exabeam leads on our overall score (69/100 against 47/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 29/100), domain rating (76/100 against 60/100), funding raised ($390M against $23.0M).
What do real users say about Exabeam and Fortscale?
Fortscale: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/u/threat_detection.
Read the full Exabeam review and pricing or the Fortscale review and pricing. You can also browse other Exabeam alternatives we track.