Evotec vs Schrödinger
Evotec vs Schrödinger, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Evotec is on 57/100 and Schrödinger on 69/100.
Where each one leads
Evotec
- headcount: 4,837 against 1,003
- LinkedIn following: 121,725 against 65,181
Schrödinger
- our overall score: 69/100 against 57/100
- funding raised: $220M against $26.9M
At a glance
| Measure | Evotec | Schrödinger |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Life science company pioneering drug discovery with AI and advanced technologies. | Physics-based software platform for molecular discovery and design in life and materials sciences. |
| Category | Drug Discovery, Biotech, AI-Driven Drug Discovery, Life Sciences | Drug Discovery, Biotech, Pharmaceuticals, Materials Science |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software | services | platform |
| Founded | 1993 | 1990 |
| Headquarters | Hamburg, Germany | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Evotec | Schrödinger |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 4,837 | 1,003 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -8.1% |
| Total funding | $26.9M | $220M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | 121,725 | 65,181 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Evotec | Schrödinger |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 69/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Evotec | Schrödinger |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Matomo | Google Tag Manager, Jetpack Stats |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Evotec vs Schrödinger: common questions
Which is better, Evotec or Schrödinger?
On our 0-100 score Schrödinger rates higher (69/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Evotec and Schrödinger compare on the numbers?
Evotec leads on headcount (4,837 against 1,003), LinkedIn following (121,725 against 65,181). Schrödinger leads on our overall score (69/100 against 57/100), funding raised ($220M against $26.9M).
Read the full Evotec review and pricing or the Schrödinger review and pricing. You can also browse other Evotec alternatives we track.