evo.ninja vs Speedata
evo.ninja vs Speedata, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: evo.ninja is on 14/100 and Speedata on 62/100.
Where each one leads
evo.ninja
- domain rating: 42/100 against 19/100
Speedata
- our overall score: 62/100 against 14/100
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 44/100
- headcount: 103 against 1
- LinkedIn following: 5,497 against 1,009
At a glance
| Measure | evo.ninja | Speedata |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Launch interactive AI streamers in minutes with customizable, life-like agents that multistream across platforms. | Develops the C200 Analytics Processing Unit (APU), an ASIC for massive-scale analytics. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Agent, Foundation Model, Generative AI | Enterprise, Analytics, Data, VLSI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | Not published | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Not published | San Jose, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | evo.ninja | Speedata |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1 | 103 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +28.5% |
| Total funding | Not published | $158M |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,009 | 5,497 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | evo.ninja | Speedata |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 14/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 3/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (52/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 42/100 | 19/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | evo.ninja | Speedata |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | Wix |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | evo.ninja | Speedata |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Dynamic Task Adaptation, Specialized Agent Personas, Intelligent Execution Loop, CLI & UI Operation, Session Workspace Management, OpenAI & SERP API Integration | Not published |
What users say
| Measure | evo.ninja | Speedata |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 2 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads | Not published |
“Meet Evo.ninja: The AI That Learns in Real-Time 🥇. Meet Evo.ninja: The AI That Learns in Real-Time 🥇 Hey Reddit! Big news: https://evo.ninja won first place at SuperAGI's Autonomous Agents Hackathon! What Is Evo.ninja? An AI agent that ev”r/AutoGPT
evo.ninja vs Speedata: common questions
Which is better, evo.ninja or Speedata?
On our 0-100 score Speedata rates higher (62/100 against 14/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do evo.ninja and Speedata compare on the numbers?
evo.ninja leads on domain rating (42/100 against 19/100). Speedata leads on our overall score (62/100 against 14/100), agent readiness (52/100 against 44/100), headcount (103 against 1), LinkedIn following (5,497 against 1,009).
What do real users say about evo.ninja and Speedata?
evo.ninja: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/AutoGPT.
Read the full evo.ninja review and pricing or the Speedata review and pricing. You can also browse other evo.ninja alternatives we track.