Evo.do vs Mabl
Evo.do vs Mabl, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Evo.do is on 12/100 and Mabl on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Evo.do
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Mabl
- our overall score: 61/100 against 12/100
- domain rating: 69/100 against 28/100
- headcount: 115 against 1
- LinkedIn following: 11,583 against 28
At a glance
| Measure | Evo.do | Mabl |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Evo.do is a reputation management platform for businesses, focusing on Google Maps, Yandex Maps, and 2GIS. | AI-native, low-code test automation platform for software quality engineering. |
| Category | Enterprise, Development, AI Testing, MLOps | MLOps, Developer Tools, API Platform, Enterprise Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Boston, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Evo.do | Mabl |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1 | 115 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -14.4% | Not published |
| Total funding | Not published | $70.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 28 | 11,583 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Evo.do | Mabl |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 12/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 3/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 14/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 28/100 | 69/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Evo.do | Mabl |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | Intercom |
Evo.do vs Mabl: common questions
Which is better, Evo.do or Mabl?
On our 0-100 score Mabl rates higher (61/100 against 12/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Evo.do and Mabl compare on the numbers?
Mabl leads on our overall score (61/100 against 12/100), domain rating (69/100 against 28/100), headcount (115 against 1), LinkedIn following (11,583 against 28).
Read the full Evo.do review and pricing or the Mabl review and pricing. You can also browse other Evo.do alternatives we track.