Evercam vs Trusstor
Evercam vs Trusstor, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Evercam is on 54/100 and Trusstor on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Evercam
- domain rating: 48/100 against 25/100
- headcount: 159 against 13
- funding raised: $63.0M against $4.5M
- LinkedIn following: 14,195 against 3,341
Trusstor
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Evercam | Trusstor |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered construction site monitoring and management. | A construction operations platform integrating IoT, oversight, reporting, and analytics for site performance. |
| Category | Construction, Artificial Intelligence, Proptech, Construction Tech | Construction, Intelligence, Data, IoT |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Dublin, Ireland | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Evercam | Trusstor |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 159 | 13 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -16.2% |
| Total funding | $63.0M | $4.5M |
| Latest round | Series B | Seed |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 14,195 | 3,341 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Evercam | Trusstor |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 45/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 24/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 48/100 | 25/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Evercam | Trusstor |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Google Cloud |
What users say
| Measure | Evercam | Trusstor |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 5 positive, 0 negative across 5 threads | Not published |
“Evercam 4D View Helps to Leverage Engineering Data for Stakeholders.”r/ConstructionTech
Evercam vs Trusstor: common questions
Which is better, Evercam or Trusstor?
On our 0-100 score Evercam rates higher (54/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Evercam and Trusstor compare on the numbers?
Evercam leads on domain rating (48/100 against 25/100), headcount (159 against 13), funding raised ($63.0M against $4.5M), LinkedIn following (14,195 against 3,341).
What do real users say about Evercam and Trusstor?
Evercam: 5 positive and 0 negative mentions across 5 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/ConstructionTech.
Read the full Evercam review and pricing or the Trusstor review and pricing. You can also browse other Evercam alternatives we track.