Evercam vs Genda
Evercam vs Genda, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Evercam is on 54/100 and Genda on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Evercam
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 48/100 against 26/100
- headcount: 159 against 22
- funding raised: $63.0M against $12.3M
- LinkedIn following: 14,195 against 3,052
Genda
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Evercam | Genda |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered construction site monitoring and management. | Construction site real-time data gathering for improved operational efficiency and safety. |
| Category | Construction, Artificial Intelligence, Proptech, Construction Tech | Construction, IoT, Sensor, Construction Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2017 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Dublin, Ireland | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Evercam | Genda |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 159 | 22 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +17.8% |
| Total funding | $63.0M | $12.3M |
| Latest round | Series B | Seed |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 14,195 | 3,052 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Evercam | Genda |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 49/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 48/100 | 26/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Evercam | Genda |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | Evercam | Genda |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 5 positive, 0 negative across 5 threads | Not published |
“Evercam 4D View Helps to Leverage Engineering Data for Stakeholders.”r/ConstructionTech
Evercam vs Genda: common questions
Which is better, Evercam or Genda?
Both score the same on our 0-100 rating, so the choice comes down to the 17 data points in the tables above rather than overall company strength.
How do Evercam and Genda compare on the numbers?
Evercam leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 39/100), domain rating (48/100 against 26/100), headcount (159 against 22), funding raised ($63.0M against $12.3M), LinkedIn following (14,195 against 3,052).
What do real users say about Evercam and Genda?
Evercam: 5 positive and 0 negative mentions across 5 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/ConstructionTech.
Read the full Evercam review and pricing or the Genda review and pricing. You can also browse other Evercam alternatives we track.