Eve Security vs Irregular
Eve Security vs Irregular, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Eve Security is on 48/100 and Irregular on 70/100.
Where each one leads
Eve Security
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Irregular
- our overall score: 70/100 against 48/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 42/100
- domain rating: 64/100 against 20/100
- headcount: 46 against 14
- funding raised: $168M against $13.0M
- LinkedIn following: 4,452 against 1,739
At a glance
| Measure | Eve Security | Irregular |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Protects organizations from the hidden risks of autonomous AI agents across workflows, data, and applications. | Frontier security lab building defenses to uncover and secure advanced AI before release. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Governance, AI Safety, Cybersecurity | AI Safety, AI Alignment, Frontier AI Lab, Foundation Model |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Services |
| Founded | 2023 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Eve Security | Irregular |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 14 | 46 |
| Total funding | $13.0M | $168M |
| Valuation | Not published | $450M |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,739 | 4,452 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Eve Security | Irregular |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 48/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | 47/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 80/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 46/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 20/100 | 64/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Eve Security | Irregular |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Framer |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Microsoft Clarity | Google Analytics 4 |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Eve Security | Irregular |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Secure & Control Agentic AI adoption and usage, Visibility and Control, Integration with existing security stack, Agent-in-the-Loop, Focus on Crown Jewels | Frontier AI Security, Vulnerability Discovery & Mitigation, AI Model Evaluation, Confidential AI Inference Systems |
Eve Security vs Irregular: common questions
Which is better, Eve Security or Irregular?
On our 0-100 score Irregular rates higher (70/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Eve Security and Irregular compare on the numbers?
Irregular leads on our overall score (70/100 against 48/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 42/100), domain rating (64/100 against 20/100), headcount (46 against 14), funding raised ($168M against $13.0M), LinkedIn following (4,452 against 1,739).
Read the full Eve Security review and pricing or the Irregular review and pricing. You can also browse other Eve Security alternatives we track.