eSUB vs Fieldlens
eSUB vs Fieldlens, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: eSUB is on 46/100 and Fieldlens on 59/100.
Where each one leads
eSUB
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Fieldlens
- our overall score: 59/100 against 46/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 35/100
- funding raised: $17.7M against $10.0M
At a glance
| Measure | eSUB | Fieldlens |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Construction project management software for subcontractors to track labor, equipment, and costs. | Real-time jobsite collaboration software connecting field and office teams in construction. |
| Category | Construction Tech, Vertical SaaS, Project Management, Field Service Management | Construction Tech, Vertical SaaS, Project Management, Collaboration Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2004 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | San Diego, United States | Tampa, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | eSUB | Fieldlens |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 99 |
| Total funding | $10.0M | $17.7M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 8,652 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | eSUB | Fieldlens |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 46/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 35/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 40/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 3/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (35/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 61/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | eSUB | Fieldlens |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | eSUB | Fieldlens |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 0 negative across 3 threads |
“WeWork has acquired 21 startups in the last four years, from a college messaging service to a real estate investing app. Here's everything WeWork has bought.. Spacious SpaceIQ Waltz Prolific Interactive Islands Media Managed by Q Euclid Ana”r/buzzfeedbot
eSUB vs Fieldlens: common questions
Which is better, eSUB or Fieldlens?
On our 0-100 score Fieldlens rates higher (59/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do eSUB and Fieldlens compare on the numbers?
Fieldlens leads on our overall score (59/100 against 46/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 35/100), funding raised ($17.7M against $10.0M).
What do real users say about eSUB and Fieldlens?
Fieldlens: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/buzzfeedbot.
Read the full eSUB review and pricing or the Fieldlens review and pricing. You can also browse other eSUB alternatives we track.