Establishment Labs Holdings vs Sedivention

Establishment Labs Holdings vs Sedivention, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Establishment Labs Holdings is on 48/100 and Sedivention on 54/100.

Establishment Labs Holdings logo
Establishment Labs HoldingsA global medical technology company focused on women's health and wellness, particularly in breast aesthetics and reconstruction.
Try Establishment Labs Holdings
Sedivention logo
SediventionDeveloping a minimally invasive, one-time outpatient therapy for obesity treatment.
Try Sedivention

Where each one leads

Establishment Labs Holdings

  • agent readiness: 42/100 against 27/100
  • domain rating: 51/100 against 11/100
  • funding raised: $63.0M against $10.0M

Sedivention

  • our overall score: 54/100 against 48/100

At a glance

MeasureEstablishment Labs HoldingsSedivention
What it isA global medical technology company focused on women's health and wellness, particularly in breast aesthetics and reconstruction.Developing a minimally invasive, one-time outpatient therapy for obesity treatment.
CategoryMedical Devices, Biotechnology, HealthcareMedical Devices, Biotechnology, HealthTech, Obesity Treatment
Sells toBusiness modelB2BB2B2C
OfferingHardwareHardware
Founded20042021
HeadquartersWellington, USABerlin, Germany
StatusActiveActive

Size, funding and growth

MeasureEstablishment Labs HoldingsSedivention
Employees954Not published
Open roles18Not published
Total funding$63.0M$10.0M
Latest roundDebt FinancingSeed
Valuation$1.1BNot published
LinkedIn followers36,364Not published

StartupHub scores

Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.

MeasureEstablishment Labs HoldingsSedivention
StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating48/10054/100
Traction59/100Not published
TeamNot published36/100
Search visibility32/100Not published
Quality58/100Not published
Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the siteD (42/100)F (27/100)
Domain ratingLink authority, 0-10051/10011/100

Technology

Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.

MeasureEstablishment Labs HoldingsSedivention
HostingAWSSelf Managed
CMSWordPressWordPress
FrameworksJquery, BootstrapJquery
AnalyticsGoogle Analytics 4Not detected

Establishment Labs Holdings vs Sedivention: common questions

Which is better, Establishment Labs Holdings or Sedivention?

On our 0-100 score Sedivention rates higher (54/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.

How do Establishment Labs Holdings and Sedivention compare on the numbers?

Establishment Labs Holdings leads on agent readiness (42/100 against 27/100), domain rating (51/100 against 11/100), funding raised ($63.0M against $10.0M). Sedivention leads on our overall score (54/100 against 48/100).

Read the full Establishment Labs Holdings review and pricing or the Sedivention review and pricing. You can also browse other Establishment Labs Holdings alternatives we track.