EST Floattech vs Freyr Battery
EST Floattech vs Freyr Battery, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: EST Floattech is on 46/100 and Freyr Battery on 57/100.
Where each one leads
EST Floattech
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Freyr Battery
- our overall score: 57/100 against 46/100
- agent readiness: 59/100 against 45/100
- domain rating: 54/100 against 32/100
- headcount: 241 against 36
- headcount growth: +116.7% against -14.3%
- funding raised: $2.7B against $4.3M
- LinkedIn following: 53,256 against 5,335
At a glance
| Measure | EST Floattech | Freyr Battery |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Dutch company developing and producing high-quality lithium-ion battery systems for electric and hybrid maritime propulsion. | Developing and manufacturing next-generation battery cells for clean energy solutions. |
| Category | Energy Storage, Battery Technology, Maritime Technology, Electric Vehicles | Energy Storage, Battery Technology, Clean Energy, Advanced Manufacturing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2009 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Groningen, Netherlands | Luxembourg City, Luxembourg |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | EST Floattech | Freyr Battery |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 36 | 241 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -14.3% | +116.7% |
| Total funding | $4.3M | $2.7B |
| Latest round | Series A | Grant |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,335 | 53,256 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | EST Floattech | Freyr Battery |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 46/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 48/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (59/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 32/100 | 54/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | EST Floattech | Freyr Battery |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Not detected |
EST Floattech vs Freyr Battery: common questions
Which is better, EST Floattech or Freyr Battery?
On our 0-100 score Freyr Battery rates higher (57/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do EST Floattech and Freyr Battery compare on the numbers?
Freyr Battery leads on our overall score (57/100 against 46/100), agent readiness (59/100 against 45/100), domain rating (54/100 against 32/100), headcount (241 against 36), headcount growth (+116.7% against -14.3%), funding raised ($2.7B against $4.3M), LinkedIn following (53,256 against 5,335).
Read the full EST Floattech review and pricing or the Freyr Battery review and pricing. You can also browse other EST Floattech alternatives we track.