Eragon vs Reco
Eragon vs Reco, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Eragon is on 52/100 and Reco on 65/100.
Where each one leads
Eragon
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Reco
- our overall score: 65/100 against 52/100
- domain rating: 68/100 against 42/100
- headcount: 185 against 7
- funding raised: $123M against $12.0M
- LinkedIn following: 17,359 against 1,794
At a glance
| Measure | Eragon | Reco |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Agentic AI operating system designed to replace traditional enterprise software interfaces with natural language prompts. | Identity-first SaaS security platform for discovering and controlling SaaS applications, identities, and data. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Operating System, Enterprise Software, Foundation Model | Cybersecurity, SaaS Security, Cloud Security, Identity & Access Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2025 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Eragon | Reco |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 7 | 185 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +86.9% | +88.4% |
| Total funding | $12.0M | $123M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series B |
| Valuation | $100M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,794 | 17,359 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Eragon | Reco |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 52/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | 44/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 23/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 50/100 | 56/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 42/100 | 68/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Eragon | Reco |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Framer | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | Eragon | Reco |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 3.0/5 from 2 votes | Not published |
Eragon vs Reco: common questions
Which is better, Eragon or Reco?
On our 0-100 score Reco rates higher (65/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Eragon and Reco compare on the numbers?
Reco leads on our overall score (65/100 against 52/100), domain rating (68/100 against 42/100), headcount (185 against 7), funding raised ($123M against $12.0M), LinkedIn following (17,359 against 1,794).
Read the full Eragon review and pricing or the Reco review and pricing. You can also browse other Eragon alternatives we track.