Equinix vs Megaport
Equinix vs Megaport, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Equinix is on 36/100 and Megaport on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Equinix
- domain rating: 82/100 against 72/100
- headcount: 14,330 against 599
- LinkedIn following: 582,805 against 44,965
Megaport
- our overall score: 54/100 against 36/100
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 25/100
- funding raised: $629M against $175M
At a glance
| Measure | Equinix | Megaport |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global leader in data center colocation and interconnection services. | Global cloud connectivity and networking services provider. |
| Category | Data Center Infrastructure, Cloud Infrastructure, Colocation, Interconnection | Cloud Computing, Networking, Data Center, Artificial Intelligence |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 1998 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Redwood City, United States | Brisbane, Australia |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Equinix | Megaport |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 14,330 | 599 |
| Total funding | $175M | $629M |
| Latest round | Grant (prize money) | Funding Round |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 582,805 | 44,965 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Equinix | Megaport |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 36/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 10/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 25/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (25/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 82/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Equinix | Megaport |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Netlify |
| CDN | Not detected | Netlify |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Segment |
Equinix vs Megaport: common questions
Which is better, Equinix or Megaport?
On our 0-100 score Megaport rates higher (54/100 against 36/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Equinix and Megaport compare on the numbers?
Equinix leads on domain rating (82/100 against 72/100), headcount (14,330 against 599), LinkedIn following (582,805 against 44,965). Megaport leads on our overall score (54/100 against 36/100), agent readiness (41/100 against 25/100), funding raised ($629M against $175M).
Read the full Equinix review and pricing or the Megaport review and pricing. You can also browse other Equinix alternatives we track.