Epsio vs FalkorDB
Epsio vs FalkorDB, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Epsio is on 46/100 and FalkorDB on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Epsio
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
FalkorDB
- our overall score: 54/100 against 46/100
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 40/100
- domain rating: 55/100 against 26/100
- headcount: 19 against 9
- LinkedIn following: 4,097 against 890
At a glance
| Measure | Epsio | FalkorDB |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Enterprise database for real-time analytics and operational workloads. | Queryable property graph database using sparse matrices and linear algebra for graph queries. |
| Category | Enterprise, Database, Enterprise Software, Data Platform | Enterprise, Database, Generative AI, Infrastructure |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Epsio | FalkorDB |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 9 | 19 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +98.3% |
| Total funding | Not published | $3.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 890 | 4,097 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Epsio | FalkorDB |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 46/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 10/100 | 45/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | D (57/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 26/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Epsio | FalkorDB |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Epsio vs FalkorDB: common questions
Which is better, Epsio or FalkorDB?
On our 0-100 score FalkorDB rates higher (54/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Epsio and FalkorDB compare on the numbers?
FalkorDB leads on our overall score (54/100 against 46/100), agent readiness (57/100 against 40/100), domain rating (55/100 against 26/100), headcount (19 against 9), LinkedIn following (4,097 against 890).
Read the full Epsio review and pricing or the FalkorDB review and pricing. You can also browse other Epsio alternatives we track.