Epsagon vs Rookout
Epsagon vs Rookout, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Epsagon is on 62/100 and Rookout on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Epsagon
- headcount growth: -21.9% against -30.6%
- funding raised: $30.1M against $20.2M
Rookout
- agent readiness: 60/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 83/100 against 64/100
- headcount: 21 against 16
At a glance
| Measure | Epsagon | Rookout |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Automated observability and tracing for microservices to fix issues faster. | Live debugging platform for engineers to solve customer issues faster in any environment. |
| Category | Enterprise, Information Technology (IT), Serverless, Microservices | Enterprise, Development, DevOps, Observability |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2017 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Epsagon | Rookout |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 16 | 21 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -21.9% | -30.6% |
| Total funding | $30.1M | $20.2M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series B |
| Valuation | $200M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,042 | 8,090 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Epsagon | Rookout |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 48/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | C (60/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 64/100 | 83/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Epsagon | Rookout |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | CloudFront |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Nuxt, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Epsagon vs Rookout: common questions
Which is better, Epsagon or Rookout?
On our 0-100 score Rookout rates higher (63/100 against 62/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Epsagon and Rookout compare on the numbers?
Epsagon leads on headcount growth (-21.9% against -30.6%), funding raised ($30.1M against $20.2M). Rookout leads on agent readiness (60/100 against 22/100), domain rating (83/100 against 64/100), headcount (21 against 16).
Read the full Epsagon review and pricing or the Rookout review and pricing. You can also browse other Epsagon alternatives we track.