Epsagon vs New Relic
Epsagon vs New Relic, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Epsagon is on 62/100 and New Relic on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Epsagon
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
New Relic
- agent readiness: 60/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 88/100 against 64/100
- headcount: 2,500 against 16
- funding raised: $7.2B against $30.1M
At a glance
| Measure | Epsagon | New Relic |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Automated observability and tracing for microservices to fix issues faster. | A data observability company that helps enterprises monitor, debug, and optimize their software stack. |
| Category | Enterprise, Information Technology (IT), Serverless, Microservices | Enterprise Software, Observability, Application Performance Management, Artificial Intelligence |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2017 | 2008 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Epsagon | New Relic |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 16 | 2,500 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -21.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $30.1M | $7.2B |
| Latest round | Series A | Acquisition |
| Valuation | $200M | $6.5B |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,042 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Epsagon | New Relic |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 40/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 46/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | C (60/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 64/100 | 88/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Epsagon | New Relic |
|---|---|---|
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Segment |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Epsagon vs New Relic: common questions
Which is better, Epsagon or New Relic?
On our 0-100 score Epsagon rates higher (62/100 against 59/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Epsagon and New Relic compare on the numbers?
New Relic leads on agent readiness (60/100 against 22/100), domain rating (88/100 against 64/100), headcount (2,500 against 16), funding raised ($7.2B against $30.1M).
Read the full Epsagon review and pricing or the New Relic review and pricing. You can also browse other Epsagon alternatives we track.