Epsagon vs leap.new
Epsagon vs leap.new, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Epsagon is on 62/100 and leap.new on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Epsagon
- our overall score: 62/100 against 53/100
- domain rating: 63/100 against 45/100
- headcount: 16 against 1
- funding raised: $30.1M against $10.0M
- LinkedIn following: 7,042 against 2,450
leap.new
- agent readiness: 56/100 against 22/100
At a glance
| Measure | Epsagon | leap.new |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Automated observability and tracing for microservices to fix issues faster. | AI developer agent that builds and deploys production-grade applications to your cloud. |
| Category | Enterprise, Information Technology (IT), Serverless, Microservices | AI Agent, Agentic AI, Developer Tools, Cloud Infrastructure |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2017 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Epsagon | leap.new |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 16 | 1 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -21.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $30.1M | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Not published |
| Valuation | $200M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,042 | 2,450 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Epsagon | leap.new |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 38/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (56/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 63/100 | 45/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Epsagon | leap.new |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Facebook Pixel |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Epsagon | leap.new |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | AI Developer Agent, Production-Grade Apps, Cloud Deployment, Open Source Support, Prisma ORM Integration, PostHog Integration |
Epsagon vs leap.new: common questions
Which is better, Epsagon or leap.new?
On our 0-100 score Epsagon rates higher (62/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Epsagon and leap.new compare on the numbers?
Epsagon leads on our overall score (62/100 against 53/100), domain rating (63/100 against 45/100), headcount (16 against 1), funding raised ($30.1M against $10.0M), LinkedIn following (7,042 against 2,450). leap.new leads on agent readiness (56/100 against 22/100).
Read the full Epsagon review and pricing or the leap.new review and pricing. You can also browse other Epsagon alternatives we track.